So there is no p find a good crackable solution and use that and making crack's job harder. Sometimes i do reverse engineering for learning and crackers know ways better than us. It will be very hard for anyone to steal your property in this case without any credit to you in some way as the creator. Then again, I have another theory: I don't mind people using my ideas or property, even for profit, as long as I'm given credit. The numbers are only hypothetical here, but you get the idea how you can reduce them drastically in your favor. A good watermark (as mentioned) identifying your property, and a good legal disclaimer would at least make it either illegal, or make them feel guilty as sin doing it, or make them look like complete fools distributing it as if it's their own, or even worse - trying to remove that logo since they won't have the original software/methods you used to implement it. You will indeed discourage maybe 90% of the audience and 5% more who may have the idea in mind.Īs for the balance of the audience, the more "able" 5%, you have little choice other than playing the guilt game with them. Having said that, if you still want to implement such a solution, go ahead. However, most of the time, depending on how complicated such a reverse solution can be, only a small percentage are privy or seasoned with such methods. As you know, they have already broken such methods for DvD, and continue to for newer and better BD protection schemes. Computer Science theory states that any such solution can be undone.